Tom Hanks, the beloved actor known for his affable demeanor, has a surprising side to him that few people know. In a recent interview on Conan O'Brien's podcast, Hanks revealed his strong feelings about a film critic who reviewed his directorial debut, 'That Thing You Do!' in 1996. This critic's review, in Hanks' eyes, was not only unfair but also hypocritical, as the same critic had previously praised another film. Hanks' reaction is a fascinating insight into the personal impact of critical reviews on artists, especially those with a reputation for kindness and humility.
Hanks' directorial debut, 'That Thing You Do!', received a mixed reception, with some critics finding it charming but inconsequential. However, one particular review stood out and left a lasting impression on Hanks. The critic in question had previously praised another film, but when it came to 'That Thing You Do!', they took a different stance. Hanks' frustration stems from the critic's hypocrisy, as they seemed to change their tune based on the film's reception.
In the interview, Hanks expressed his disappointment and even used a colorful term to describe critics, which he later clarified was meant to be humorous. He emphasized the personal nature of his reaction, stating that it was not just about the review but also about the critic's inconsistency. Hanks' strong words highlight the emotional impact that critical reviews can have on artists, especially when they feel their work has been misunderstood or unfairly judged.
What makes Hanks' reaction even more intriguing is his own history with criticism. As an actor, he has received critical acclaim, including two Academy Awards for Best Actor. Yet, he still takes personal offense when his directorial work is not well-received. This suggests that the impact of criticism on artists can be deeply personal, even for those who are already established and respected in their field.
Furthermore, Hanks' comments about the critic's hypocrisy raise interesting questions about the objectivity of film critics. Are critics truly impartial, or do their personal biases and experiences influence their reviews? Hanks' experience suggests that critics' opinions can be shaped by their own perspectives and experiences, which may not always align with the film's intended message or impact.
In conclusion, Tom Hanks' reaction to the critic's review of 'That Thing You Do!' provides a unique insight into the personal side of artists and the impact of criticism. It highlights the emotional investment artists have in their work and the potential for critics' opinions to shape their perception of their own creations. Hanks' words also serve as a reminder that behind every artist is a person with feelings, and their reactions to criticism can reveal a lot about their character and the importance they place on their craft.
